Search for: "State v. Perez (MODIFIED)"
Results 1 - 20
of 115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2023, 10:16 am
They sue for fraudulent inducement and promissory estoppel.The case is Cordova v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
” Santizo-Perez v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:53 pm
This post was authored by Sebastian Perez, JD, Jacob D. [read post]
29 May 2023, 6:29 am
Athey Greek Christian Fellowship v Clackamas County, 2023 WL 2898934 (D. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Cohen as income to the New York State tax authorities. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:55 pm
R.B., Appellant, v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 12:59 pm
In Perez v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 7:51 am
An alimony case captioned Dills v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 8:00 am
Jesse Perez v. [read post]
30 Apr 2022, 8:55 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am
The court found that Michael's opinion was contradicted by decedent's medical records and the testimony of her physician, who stated that decedent was in full control of her faculties during an examination on the day that she executed the 2015 Will. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 12:21 pm
LISONEL PEREZ, Appellant, v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
United States, 19-5727, Perez v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:58 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:29 am
In addition, the Social Services Law was amended to comply with the federal requirement to increase from $500 to $550 the amount of support that the State must collect and disburse to the family prior to imposing the fee for each federal fiscal year. [read post]
21 May 2019, 7:14 am
In State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 12:22 pm
In the 2012 case of United States v. [read post]
