Search for: "State v. Portman" Results 1 - 20 of 120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2008, 8:50 pm
As a preliminary issue the Court refused to grant the relief because even if the Portman votes were counted and included, Portman would not have achieved its objectives. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:38 am by Amy Howe
Coverage of and commentary on the April 29 argument in Glossip v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:51 am by William Ford
The subcommittee staff’s analysis of the constitutionality of remote voting and participation focused heavily on whether a proposed change to the Senate’s rules, or the adoption of a new rule, would comply with the three-part test the Supreme Court established in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:14 am by Joe Koncelik
 Region V covers Ohio, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Indiana and Minnesota. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:00 am by Ellen D. Marcus
You can find the opinion in Stacy v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 9:20 am by Eric Goldman
Portman Says SESTA Doesn’t Affect the Good Samaritan Defense. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 2:49 am by Amy Howe
United States as a case that is “likely to be the Term’s most important federal sentencing case, and its second-most important immigration case after United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 8:36 am by Eric Goldman
Portman Says SESTA Doesn’t Affect the Good Samaritan Defense. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:57 am by Eric Goldman
Also because of the combination, FOSTA enabled a Section 230 exclusion for civil claims for state commercial sex promotions but not for state sex trafficking claims. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 8:09 am by Eric Goldman
Craigslist * Facebook Still Can’t Dismiss Sex Trafficking Victims’ Lawsuit in Texas State Court * Craigslist Denied Section 230 Immunity for Classified Ads from 2008–ML v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 8:44 am by Eric Goldman
Portman Says SESTA Doesn’t Affect the Good Samaritan Defense. [read post]