Search for: "State v. R. Clift" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2019, 8:10 am by Ilya Somin
Boyer, Eleanor Clift, former Senator John C. [read post]
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 2:13 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court held that they should depart from the decision in R (Clift) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 1 AC 484. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:36 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice was heard on 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 2:54 pm by Lovechilde
” As Eleanor Clift notes in the Daily Beast, he has also gone on record arguing that the Supreme Court made a bad ruling in the landmark freedom of the press case New York Times Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 1:00 am by Liam MacLean, Shepherd and Wedderburn
  It noted that the House of Lords (in R (Clift) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] UKHL 54) had concluded that being treated differently due to one’s status as a prisoner did not come within the ambit of Article 14 discrimination. [read post]
19 May 2014, 1:42 am by Jocelyn Hutton
  The second two appeals, R (Haney) v The Secretary of State for Justice and R (Kaiyam) v The Secretary of State for Justice will decide whether a delay in transferring the appellants to open prisons violated their rights under ECHR, arts 5 and 14 and whether the Court should depart from the precedent in R (James & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKHL 22 and R (Clift & Ors)… [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm by NL
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm by NL
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:53 am by INFORRM
  Desmond Browne QC representing Mark Lewis submitted that the allegations complained of were plainly defamatory and serious allegations and that Police as a public authority could not rely upon qualified privilege following recent authority (see Clift v Slough BC [2010] EWCA Civ 1484). [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:24 am by INFORRM
  Discusses the “populist wave directed at the European Court of Human Rights and European judges generally” resulting from the decision of the Supreme Court in R (F and FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 17 [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am by INFORRM
In the Courts There is a comment on the R (Guardian News and Media) v City of Westminster Magistrates ([2010] EWHC 3376 (Admin)) on access to documents in criminal cases by Nigel Hanson of Foot Anstey on “Hold the Front Page” The UK Human Rights Blog and Nearly Legal have posts about the case of Clift v Slough Borough Council ([2010] EWCA Civ 1171). [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:52 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty To Animals v Sharp & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1474 (21 December 2010) Quila & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1482 (21 December 2010) Francis, R (on the application of) v West Midlands Probation Board [2010] EWCA Civ 1470 (21 December 2010) Safeway Stores Ltd & Ors v Twigger & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1472 (21 December… [read post]