Search for: "State v. R. J. H."
Results 1 - 20
of 1,455
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Herbst and Benjamin J. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Herbst and Benjamin J. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
‘Now is the time to reassess presumption of parental involvement’, writes Lea Levine in the April issue of the journal[1]. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
R. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
R. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm
(forthcoming 2025); Brief Amicus Curiae of Jed H. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
(forthcoming 2025); Brief Amicus Curiae of Jed H. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been ratified so… [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Hasbrouck, Ernesto R. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Hasbrouck, Ernesto R. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Egilman of course was the editor in chief, with an editorial board made up of many well-known, high-volume testifiers for the lawsuit industry: Adriane Fugh-Berman, Barry Castleman, Michael R. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 5:38 am
Bentley v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Trump (SDNY), YALE J. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:07 am
R. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
The text applies to those who hold "civil office under the Authority of the United States. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Harold H. [read post]