Search for: "State v. R. V. B."
Results 1 - 20
of 15,485
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2024, 9:31 am
AK, R (On the Application Of) v Westminster City Council (2024) EWHC 769 (Admin) This was a judicial review of Westminster’s Allocation policy as it applied to ‘reciprocal transfers’ between another borough and Westminster. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 1:01 am
In R (GH) v The Mayor of London [2024] EWHC 1305 (Admin), the claimants, Charedi Orthodox children, sought permission to apply for judicial review of the decision of the Mayor of London to extend his Universal Free School Meals scheme for the academic year 2024-2025 but to continue to confine the scheme to state-funded primary schools. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:25 am
Elemer R. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm
[…] Given this, and considering that the appealed decision overturned the exequatur decree of the judgment in question on the ground that the [Canadian] judgment, which recognized a judgment from the United States, was a “summary judgment” (hukm musta’jil) enforceable only in the rendering State, despite the broad wording of [the applicable provisions],[vii] which covers all judgments (kul al-ahkam) rendered in a foreign State without specifying… [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Posted by Arthur B. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Posted by Arthur B. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 10:29 am
The R&R states that even on a liberal reading of the RFA, Dr. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:48 pm
R. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: R. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:42 am
This analysis is consistent with recently published decisions by both the General Court and the Boards of Appeal on the topic, inter alia: mataharispaclub v EUIPO - Rouha (SpaClubMatahari), Gugler France v EUIPO - Gugler (GUGLER), R 1320/2022-4, CELESTINO, and R 470/2023-2, TOYA (fig.).Therefore, it is crucial for bad faith applicants to prioritise thorough, high-quality evidence collection for a successful case. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am
In Ioengine, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
This is a high but not impossible bar to meet, as shown in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:43 am
Notably, § 112, r 6 does not state that the Specification must also describe equivalents of that structure. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 12:19 pm
The Cyrus R. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
The review decision in part stated I refer to R v Oxford CC ex p Doyle (1997) concluding that a Child Arrangement Order does not mean the Children are reasonably expected to live with both parents. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
‘Now is the time to reassess presumption of parental involvement’, writes Lea Levine in the April issue of the journal[1]. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am
Regarding a reasonable expectation of privacy, a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 noted that people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in an area, location or circumstance if the person does not expect to be secretly recorded or observed. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
In general, the best defences are: Legitimate Reasoning & No Undue Harm Section 163.1(6) of the Code states that if the material in question was produced for a legitimate reason related to the administration of justice, science, medicine, education or art; and it does not pose an undue risk of harm to minors, then you cannot be convicted. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
Francis, asking if she believed women should have access to Plan B. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
R. [read post]
