Search for: "State v. Rank" Results 1 - 20 of 3,615
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2024, 10:23 am by David Luban
Under the ICC’s founding principle of complementarity, a case is “inadmissible” if it is being “investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution” (Rome Statute art. 17(1)(a)). [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Lack of tree canopy, lack of air conditioning at home or work and inefficient infrastructure can also play a part, said V. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
  It's sobering that of all the times they could have discovered free-speech maximalism – and should have owned the hypocrisy –  they've done so now to protect rank antisemitism. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
Criminal Law: Language RightsR. v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm by Michael Chatzipanagiotis
Regarding the principle of equivalence, the ECJ reiterated that Article 6(1) UCTD ranks equally with domestic rules of public policy. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:32 am by Mary B. McCord
In March, our team at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection—along with our co-counsel at Law Forward and Stafford Rosenbaum, LLP—settled Penebaker v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:44 am by Eric Goldman
For example, state law might grant a high-ranking official like the director of the state department of transportation broad responsibility for the state highway system that, in context, includes authority to make official announcements on that subject. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:26 am by husovec
The EC’s objection concerning de-prioritisation of political content depends on how that policy operates: is it more of an optimisation goal in the recommender system, or an actual rule down-ranking of anything that meets some definition? [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:00 am by Donnelly L. McDowell
Despite its length, the Guidance conspicuously omits any reference to last fall’s landmark decision in FTC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am by David Pocklington
Ormondroyd Ch was unconvinced by the justification, stating: “[20]. [read post]