Search for: "State v. Raynor"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm
ShareIf the justices’ comments during Wednesday’s argument in New York v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 1:46 pm
Related Cases: Raynor v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:54 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court on Monday heard oral argument in Patel v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 12:58 pm
The Supreme Court heard telephonic argument on Monday in Salinas v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 11:21 am
Related Cases: Raynor v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 6:10 pm
Starlites Tech Corp. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:19 pm
Murray v Raynor [2019] NSWCA 274, a case concerning an email sent between tenants of a building concerning the appellant leaving their mailbox unlocked, thereby allegedly facilitating theft. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
In the case of Murray v Raynor [2019] NSWCA 274 the Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against an award of $120,000 made by the District Court. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:36 pm
In the case of Raynor v Murray ([2019] NSWDC 189) the District Court of NSW ordered Patricia Murray, a tenant of Manly residential flats known as “Watermark”, to pay damages of $120,000 to the chairman of the building’s strata committee for a defamatory email regarding an unlocked mailbox. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
In the case of Raynor v Murray ([2019] NSWDC 189) Gibson DCJ awarded the plaintiff damages of $120,000 for the publication of a defamatory email to 17 people in a building where the parties resided. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:15 pm
Raynor v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_00446.htm_________________Click here to Read a FREE excerpt from The Discipline Book concerning the due process rights of public employees in New York State served disciplinary charges [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_00446.htm_________________Click here to Read a FREE excerpt from The Discipline Book concerning the due process rights of public employees in New York State served disciplinary charges [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:59 am
Super. at 309 (quoting Raynor v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:15 am
Related Cases: Raynor v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:52 am
As part of the appellant’s application to work as a teacher, the Secretary of State for the Home Department (‘SSHD’) issued an ECRC. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 8:36 am
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress testimony — Lay witness testimony regarding heroin Convicted by a jury, in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County, of distribution of a fake controlled dangerous substance and conspiracy to distribute a fake controlled dangerous substance, Marcal Duron Raynor, appellant, presents the following issue for our review: Whether the trial ... [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 11:55 am
EFF is asking the Supreme Court to hear arguments in Raynor v. [read post]
