Search for: "State v. Rodriguez-Roman"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm
Garland – 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (2-4-22) Rodriguez v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 10:52 am
In Coy v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:34 am
In fact, the conservative majority in Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm
Rodriguez of counsel), for respondents. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm
Rodriguez of counsel), for respondents. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am
(relisted after the May 23 conference) Returning Relists Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan, Puerto Rico v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
Symposium: The Masterpiece ruling calls for increased vigilance of discrimination in the marketplace
7 Jun 2018, 6:30 am
Romans 5:8. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:18 pm
All of this cooperation is to be undertaken at the state to state level--no people to people focus here (Ibid., Art. 4). [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
The first is Gill v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 4:42 am
The employee did not allege any facts showing that the franchisors had the power to hire or fire, or make personnel decisions, supervise work schedules, determine pay rate, or maintain records of the franchisee’s employees (Rodriguez v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Rodriguez Dod Toward Justice: Michael A. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
If Hospitaller did not exist or offer appropriate services at the time of Kenneth's death, his estate would pass to the Roman Catholic Diocese of Camden, New Jersey for it to use "as nearly as possible for the intentions expressed herein, that is, for the special education and rehabilitation of the mentally and physically handicapped. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
United States, 14-10443, and Lopez v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
United States, 14-150; potential blockbuster Friedrichs v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
Cummings, 14-209, which involves the extension of lawfully initiated traffic stop after reasonable suspicion has dissipated, appears to be a hold for Rodriguez v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 10:42 am
In Roman v A1 Limousine, Inc. (76 AD3d 552, 552-553 [2010]), the Second Department declined to follow Tselebis, noting that it was inconsistent with the decision of the Court of Appeals in Thoma v Ronai (82 NY2d 736, 737 [1993]).As such, a majority of the First Department stated in Calcano: "Needless to say, it is not this Court's prerogative to overrule or disregard a precedent of the Court of Appeals. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 11:29 am
STATE v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:55 am
The State charged Roman Rodriguez under section 42.12 of the Texas Penal Code for recklessly discharging a firearm inside city limits. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:01 am
State v. [read post]
