Search for: "State v. Seats" Results 1 - 20 of 5,292
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2024, 7:03 pm by Jeanne Huang
As a consequence of the SCI Judgment, under its authority at the seat of the ICC arbitration, the High Court of Delhi set aside the ICC award.[13] Devas and its investors initiated the CC/Devas (2) investment arbitration against India alleging the latter’s retaliation for the enforcement of the ICC award.[14] Upon India’s request, the Supreme Court of Mauritius issued an interim anti-arbitration injunction.[15] India also sought to set aside the DT and CC/Devas (1) awards in… [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 1:01 am by Frank Cranmer
In R (GH) v The Mayor of London [2024] EWHC 1305 (Admin), the claimants, Charedi Orthodox children, sought permission to apply for judicial review of the decision of the Mayor of London to extend his Universal Free School Meals scheme for the academic year 2024-2025 but to continue to confine the scheme to state-funded primary schools. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am by David N. Crapo
Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered the Supreme Court’s unanimous opinion1 in Truck Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am by David N. Crapo
Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered the Supreme Court’s unanimous opinion1 in Truck Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am by David N. Crapo
Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered the Supreme Court’s unanimous opinion1 in Truck Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
  On Tuesday I attended a hearing called by the US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions to examine women’s freedoms, focusing on access to abortions across the United States two years after the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm by Alessandro Marcia
If reaching unanimity among the 27 Member States is generally challenging, this becomes even more complex when the file concerns a topic on which Member States’ sensibilities and approaches differ dramatically. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:54 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Biskupic's story also confirms what many have long suspected about the Supreme Court's decision in NAMUDNO v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
The 6-3 decision, with the justices divided on ideological lines, means that the disputed district will remain a safe seat for Republicans, who hold a 6-1 advantage in the state’s congressional delegation. [read post]