Search for: "State v. Seng" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2022, 5:55 am by Kian Vesteinsson
This is no small feat, given the track record for human rights in some ASEAN member states. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 11:10 am by Fred Abrams
Baiense of: conspiracy to defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 6:00 am by CMS
So I think on this I would adopt the words of Chief Justice Holt, in the great case of Coggs v Barnard in 1703, when he said: “I have stirred these points, which wiser heads in time may settle. [read post]
Key takeaways The Singapore High Court recently confirmed in Mah Kiat Seng v Attorney-General [2021] SGHC 202 (Mah Kiat Seng) that the common law doctrine of public interest immunity remains part of Singapore law and was not superseded by the enactment of the Evidence Act (Cap. 97) (EA) in 1893. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 5:56 am by Tian Lu
On 29 November 2017, an individual named Seng Lei (‘Seng’) filed an application (No. 27792495) in class 30 for food products to the Trade Mark Office of China (TMO). [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 5:11 am by Daphne Keller
  (Daniel Seng’s more recent work with a similar but much larger data set has great detailed statistics on DMCA removal trends, but his published conclusions do not include analysis of the validity of the claims processed.) [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:27 pm by Kevin LaCroix
    In the Singapore matter of Tan Chin Seng & Others v Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd, significant efforts were undertaken by a number of the dissatisfied club members to build a website and work to engage the 4,885 members. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 2:06 am by Peter Mahler
Matter of Yin Shin Leung Charitable Foundation v Seng, 177 AD3d 463, 2019 NY Slip Op 08261 [2d Dept Nov. 14, 2019], is one of the very few. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Since then, there is this example of critically important mobile phone tower tracking evidence that was the basis of a conviction for second degree murder at a first trial, later found to be faulty before the re-trial: R. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:36 pm
In Citicorp v Castex an interpretation clause in the agreement stated "Headings shall be ignored in construing this Trust Deed. [read post]