Search for: "State v. Shows" Results 1 - 20 of 60,025
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2024, 10:03 am by David Oscar Markus
Miami mayor @FrancisSuarez and federal judge Roy Altman show up to help clean it up. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Applying the lenient notice-pleading standard afforded to discrimination claims (Vig v New York Hairspray Co., L.P., 67 AD3d 140, 145 [1st Dept 2009]), plaintiff alleged that he was subjected to race discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law (State HRL) (Executive Law § 296) and New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Applying the lenient notice-pleading standard afforded to discrimination claims (Vig v New York Hairspray Co., L.P., 67 AD3d 140, 145 [1st Dept 2009]), plaintiff alleged that he was subjected to race discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law (State HRL) (Executive Law § 296) and New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:37 am by Peter J. Sluka
  The merger was negotiated while the entire sports betting industry held its breath; the Supreme Court was considering Murphy v National Collegiate Athletic Assn, 584 U.S. 453 (2018) the case that allowed states to legalize sports gambling. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm by Béligh Elbalti
In this respect, the DSC’s decision shows a degree of remarkable confusion in the using the appropriate legal terminology and understanding fundamental legal concepts. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Nine social media influencers, who found fame on shows such as TOWIE and Love Island, appeared before Westminster Magistrates court this week to face charges by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) concerning their promotion of an unauthorised foreign exchange trading scheme online. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 11:08 am by Tom Smith
It said that its Title IX rule was a response to Bostock v. [read post]