Search for: "State v. Slaughter" Results 1 - 20 of 648
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Berke Gursoy
This is a high but not impossible bar to meet, as shown in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by Narintohn Luangrath
Hall notes that under the test Justice Gorsuch articulates in his Gundy v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 3:22 am by Frank Cranmer
Background In Executief van de Moslims van België and Others v Belgium [2024] ECHR 137, the Flemish and Walloon Regions had both issued decrees prohibited the slaughter of animals without pre-stunning while providing for reversible stunning in cases of ritual slaughter. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:07 am by admin
Last week, Bayer broke its Philadelphia losing streak, with a win in Kline v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
The federal case of The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) v. [read post]
Today, I’m sounding the alarm once again: Military operations in Rafah could lead to a slaughter in Gaza. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:07 am by Keaoleboga Molefe
In Minister of Agriculture v Bluelilliesbush Dairy Farming (270/07) [2008] ZASCA 60 (29 May 2008), the Supreme Court of Appeal considered compensation following an outbreak of bovine tuberculosis where 7 000 cattle were slaughtered by the State in terms of the Act. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
v=BxL9DRdk6Xc   New Animation: End Hare Coursing In a world where compassion and empathy should be our guiding principles, it is disheartening to discover that some individuals derive enjoyment and profit from the suffering of innocent creatures. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
”  South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
Smith of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, who presided over United States v. [read post]