Search for: "State v. Smiley"
Results 1 - 20
of 166
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm
Main players have dubious rights—emojis, smileys—already at the border of what TM should protect. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:04 am
From Smiley v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
He acknowledged that, as a logical matter, AIRC followed from the result and rationale in the Smiley v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 11:01 am
But a letter required by the state that includes a smiley face nonetheless is not an attempt to collect a debt under federal law, and in any event, is more protective than federal law anyway, so is not preempted.In short, I agree with Judge Fletcher. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am
Meanwhile, Google has filed its opposition brief, which just like in the Northern District of California is the epitome of denial:United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Krauss, New Light on the History of Free Exercise Exemptions: The Debates in Two Eighteenth-Century State Legislatures, (Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 4, 2022).Luke Boso, Religious Liberty, Discriminatory Intent, and the Status Quo Constitution, (Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper , Jan. 2023).Enrico Bonadio, Krishna Ravi Srinivas, Balaji Parthasarathy Iyengar & Atreya Choudhary, Gandhian Philosophy and Indian Intellectual Property, (in Relevance of… [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 8:56 am
The most important choice may have been not to mount a challenge to the Court’s precedents in this area, including Smiley v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:22 pm
Thompson agreed with Roberts that a governor’s veto can limit the legislature’s power under the elections clause, pointing to the Supreme Court’s 1932 decision in Smiley v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 8:47 am
’” Even where not done so directly, the Court has repeatedly repudiated the underpinnings of the theory in cases like Smiley v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 7:20 am
In its 1932 decision in Smiley v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm
(For more evidence of lawyerly shabbiness in earlier stages of Moore v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm
Hildebrant (in 1916), to Smiley v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Peter [smiley face]. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:13 pm
Holm, Secretary of State, 285 U.S. 355 (1932), Koenig et al. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 12:05 pm
Peter [smiley face]. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
” So, too, in Smiley v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 8:54 am
Case citation: In re State, 2022 Tex. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm’n, 576 U.S. 787, 817–818 (2015); Smiley v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Hildebrandt (1916), Smiley v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Hildebrandt (1916), Smiley v. [read post]
