Search for: "State v. Sober"
Results 1 - 20
of 541
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
It's sobering that of all the times they could have discovered free-speech maximalism – and should have owned the hypocrisy – they've done so now to protect rank antisemitism. [read post]
3 May 2024, 11:33 am
More sober critics, like co-blogger Eugene V. earlier today, worry about the chilling effect it will have on anti-Israel speech given that hostile environment cases sometimes rest in part on speech that would otherwise be constitutionally protected. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:11 am
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
In commenting on Murthy v. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Marion County or Shelby County v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am
And don’t get me started on the Reasonably Scared Cop Rule of Graham v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 1:17 pm
This Article is especially critical of the state action doctrine best known from Blum v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 10:48 am
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:40 am
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[2] In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 1:23 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:35 pm
Near the end of 2023, the United States Supreme Court declined to consider the City of Costa Mesa’s appeal of a January Ninth Circuit ruling in SoCal Recovery, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am
Facebook opinion (the court praises that dissent as “influential”–though surely not more influential in California state courts than Barrett v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
States can no longer pretend not to know this. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:50 am
When I was a student, the first day of my “Administrative & Regulatory State” course featured discussion of a single case: Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 4:45 am
Judge Smith cites a prior ruling in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
From Hakim v. [read post]
