Search for: "State v. Standard" Results 1 - 20 of 50,560
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Keith Mallinson
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:29 am by Ronald Mann
We can only wait for the decision later this month in Harrington v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm by John Elwood
Texas mandate that courts deem the standard of “significantly subaverage intellectual functioning” for determining intellectual disability in Atkins v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:14 am by Rich Worf
The district court denied State Farm’s motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), concluding that the policy’s coverage of “direct physical loss” was ambiguous under Virginia standards, and could include the losses Elegant Massage alleged. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Michael Oykhman
In general, the best defences are: Legitimate Reasoning & No Undue Harm Section 163.1(6) of the Code states that if the material in question was produced for a legitimate reason related to the administration of justice, science, medicine, education or art; and it does not pose an undue risk of harm to minors, then you cannot be convicted. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
United States and Free Exercise after Fulton (75 ALA. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 2:39 pm by Unknown
United States (Breach of Fiduciary Duties; National Indian Forest Resources Management Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2024.html Lundeen v. [read post]
That is, the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (“LDEQ”) may use such data “to review compliance with the state’s promulgated air monitoring requirements as part of its assessment of compliance with the air quality standards in 40 CFR Part 50, including the NAAQS[,]” and “to review compliance with the state’s ambient air quality standards for hazardous air pollutants and toxic air pollutants. [read post]