Search for: "State v. Steven H" Results 1 - 20 of 814
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2024, 10:01 pm by rhapsodyinbooks
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Paul Stevens There were two strong dissents in the case. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Kinsey Distinguished Chair in Finance at Louisiana State University; Steven Feinstein, an associate professor of finance at Babson College and the founder, president, and senior expert of Crowninshield Financial Research; and Onnig H. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
The Keep Your Opinions to Yourself Award: Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita The Failed Sunshine State Award: Florida Gov. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff
The momentous decision was handed down by United States District Court Judge George H. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 12:56 am by Steven Calabresi
The three Attorneys General, on behalf of whom the amicus brief was filed, served under four different Republican Presidents: Ronald Reagan, George H. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am by Guest Author
”  How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]