Search for: "State v. Strickland" Results 1 - 20 of 869
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2024, 7:14 am by Alex Phipps
The court noted the applicable two-part test under Strickland v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 10:32 am by Orin S. Kerr
The parties shall address whether the Court of Appeals erred by: (1) holding that the warrant to search the defendant's cell phone violated the Fourth Amendment's particularity requirement, see People v Hughes, 506 Mich 512, 538 (2020); (2) failing to sever any valid portions of the search warrant from any invalid portions, see People v Keller, 479 Mich 467, 479 (2007); (3) holding that the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule did not apply, see People v… [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 5:19 am by Phil Dixon
Applying the historical tradition test from New York Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:50 pm by Amy Howe
Applying the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
Criminal Law: Language RightsR. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 11:07 am by Paul Cassell
In response, the D.A.'s Office filed a brief asserting that it had "carefully reviewed the facts and law and determined that Wharton's ineffectiveness claim fulfills the criteria articulated in Strickland v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:17 am by Amy Howe
It argued that the lower court had misapplied the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 12:55 pm by Joseph L. Hyde
Strickland, 321 N.C. 31, 39, 361 S.E.2d 882, 886–87 (1987) (prior assaults); Morgan, 315 N.C. at 635, 340 S.E.2d at 90 (same); but see State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 5:26 am by John Elwood
Doster, 23-154Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]