Search for: "State v. Stuart"
Results 1 - 20
of 927
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2024, 9:49 pm
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the CFPB's funding mechanism in its 7-2 decision in CFPB v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia Synergy 360 chief executive David Milo has dropped his defamation lawsuit against Nine over reports that he engaged in corrupt practices with ex-federal frontbencher Stuart Robert. [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:54 am
Last year, the state court ruled in favor of the 16 youth plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am
Connecticut and Eisenstadt v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Consistent with Guideline 7 of the 2023 Merger Guidelines, the FTC notes that over the last decade, Tapestry has already consolidated Coach, Kate Spade and Stuart Weitzman and that Capri has consolidated Michael Kors, Versace and Jimmy Choo. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:29 pm
The bill makes paint different than other recycled materials in the State. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
” As stated by Stuart E. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
In commenting on Murthy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
The debate over what is often termed “jawboning” will come before the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 1:57 am
Or is this more of a Brigham City v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
In that context, the baseline problem is strongly associated with Cass Sunstein, and especially with his analysis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Lochner v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:05 pm
This note will touch on the concepts of personal liberty in the context of abortion in the landmark case Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 3:10 am
Stuart Harrow, a longtime Defense Department employee, was furloughed in 2013 due to federal budget cuts. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:36 pm
Jones, and Stuart Kyle Duncan, reversed the District Court’s decision. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
