Search for: "State v. Sussex"
Results 1 - 20
of 239
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
The claimants, who include the Duke of Sussex, Guy Ritchie, Hugh Grant and Doreen Lawrence, sought to add further evidence to their claim, including 235 stories which appeared in the Sun and News of the World between 1994 and 2016. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
As CISA Director Jen Easterly noted to the New York Times,[15] the most “critical infrastructure” of the United States is our cognitive infrastructure – the framework and tools by which citizens examine and analyze reality. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 12:13 pm
Derived from the case United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
United States The House of Representatives have passed the Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, a bill which has been characterised as having the power to ban TikTok. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
As mentioned above, on the same day Fancourt J handed down judgment following the consequentials hearing in The Duke of Sussex v MGN. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 29 January 2024, the consequentials hearing was heard following the judgment of The Duke of Sussex & Ors v MGN Ltd [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch), handed down on 15 December 2023. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
In December 2023, the Duke of Sussex’s application to have the defence of honest opinion struck out was refused, The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2023] EWHC 3120 (KB). [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:44 am
Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers [2023] EWHC 3120 (KB). [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
On 15 December 2023, as stated above, Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
On 8 December 2023, judgment was handed down in The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2023] EWHC 3120 (KB). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
Scobie stated that he had not included the names to comply with libel laws and asserted that the allegations had been printed in error. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm
The Supreme Court, in Lord Sales judgment, restates the starting position, as per R v East Sussex County Council, Ex p Tandy (1998) AC 714, that where Parliament imposes a statutory duty on a public authority to provide a specific benefit or service, it does so on the footing that the authority must be taken to have the resources available to comply with that duty. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
I would add that the same is true of the relevance of the creative process, especially if this was intended as an intention to create something 'artistic': the author’s state of mind, intention, sanity or lack thereof count and should count 0. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
United States X, formerly known as Twitter, has filed a federal defamat [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
Musk has threatened to sue Media Matters, who reported the antisemitic content they found on X and have stated that they would defend any litigation. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
The seven claimants bringing proceedings are: Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon OBE; Elizabeth Hurley; Sir Elton John CH CBE; David Furnish; Sir Simon Hughes; Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex; and Sadie Frost Law. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
On 1 and 2 November 2023, the UK Supreme court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
United States Patrick Reed’s $750m (£618m) defamation lawsuits against golf reporters and media outlets has been dismissed by a federal judge in Florida. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
The DfE responded to the investigation by stating it would not be appropriate to comment on individual cases. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
There was also a hearing in the case of Secretary of State for Defence v Persons Unknown. [read post]
