Search for: "State v. Swales"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court, Sackett v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 8:54 am
Challenging the Lusardi Standard The Lusardi standard was first challenged in January of 2021,when the Fifth Circuit rejected it in Swales v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 12:18 pm
A&L countered that the Sixth Circuit should adopt the Fifth Circuit’s recently formulated approach in Swales v. [read post]
A “Strong Likelihood” of Change: Sixth Circuit Joins the Fifth in Raising the FLSA Certification Bar
22 May 2023, 9:53 am
Swales Enters the Chat All of this started to change in January 2021, when the Fifth Circuit rejected Lusardi and announced a new approach Swales v. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 1:15 pm
For example, in the 1981 case of Stone v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 8:56 am
The People of the State of California v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 6:00 am
As stated above, the church and its contractor built a swale that encroached on the Sawyers’ property. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 8:32 am
Joh v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 12:12 pm
In Swales v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 9:38 am
In a provocative decision in the case known as Swales v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 11:15 am
The case is entitled Swales et al. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 12:05 pm
For decades, defendants have been hampered in their efforts by procedural hurdles to effective challenges, but on January 12, 2021, in Swales v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 8:47 am
This changed with the Fifth Circuit’s recent decision in Swales v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 10:28 pm
Natural watercourses include not only traditional waterways such as open ditches, swales or depressions in the ground where water naturally flows, but also underground tiling systems. [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:19 am
Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 6:50 am
The recent ruling applying the doctrine was issued by the state’s Third District Court of Appeal in the case of Melitina Valiente v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
Sierra Club, et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 2:25 pm
In State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 9:53 am
Swales & Erdem Erinc, Canadian Insurance Taxation, 4th ed. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 11:02 am
But short, the UT found that the FTT in this case was wrong to uphold a ‘separated family’ appeal on the basis that Reg B13 was not affected by the decision in R v Housing Benefit Review Board for Swale Borough Council, ex party Marchant. [read post]