Search for: "State v. T. B." Results 1 - 20 of 18,240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2024, 9:26 am by Tobin Admin
§§ 33-24-51(b) and 36-92-2 isn’t limited by the terms ‘actively in use’ ‘as a vehicle. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:47 am by Michael Oykhman
The case of R v ML, 2021 NBCA 27 also stated that the actus reus is made out where a “reasonable person aware of the circumstances would perceive the words as a threat of death or bodily harm”. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 11:37 am by Giles Peaker
But then s.167 – no re-entry or forfeiture for small amounts, expressly states “long lease” has the meaning given by sections 76 and 77 of this Act, except that a shared ownership lease is a long lease whatever the tenant’s total share, And, of course, forfeiture doesn’t apply to an assured tenancy, as it is expressly ruled out by Housing Act 1988. [read post]
30 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On May 23, 2024, the United States Supreme Court unanimously held in Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 10:03 am by Michael C. Dorf
Perhaps that's a fair rejoinder in an ordinary case, but it doesn't work in Dobbs or Alexander.In Dobbs, the Court was asked to overrule Roe v. [read post]