Search for: "State v. Tench"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:16 pm
Supreme Court has granted certiorari to hear a major case on the right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am
Today’s live blog team comprises Devina Shah, Jennifer Love, Siobhan Kahmann, Russell Hoare and another round-up of the day’s hearing from Dan Tench, Kenny Henderson, Siobhan Kahmann and Jess Foley, all from CMS. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:02 am
Today’s live blog team comprises Devina Shah, Jess Maddox, Imtiyaz Chowdhury, Temi Orekunrin, Andrew Starling, Will Anderson and a round-up of the day’s hearing from Dan Tench, Kenny Henderson and Jess Foley, all from CMS. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:51 pm
Dan Tench, Emma Boffey, Graeme MacLeod and Jo Clark are solicitors at CMS This post originally appeared on the CMS Law-Now website and is reproduced with permission and thanks [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am
Omar Qureshi, Dan Tench and Cathryn Hopkins of CMS comment on the decision which was handed down on 15 May 2019 by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal and others [2019] UKSC 22: On 15 May 2019, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment, deciding by a slim majority of 4:3 that an “ouster clause” in section 67(8) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (“RIPA”)… [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm
In Lord Carnwath’s view, the provision in s.67(8) RIPA for a route of appeal to the Secretary of State did not add anything, given that that power had not been exercised and was ultimately an executive power, so did not support the argument that the courts should not have ultimate control [104]. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:12 am
His interview with Dan Tench and Lucy Hayes reveals that he takes a “long view” on Brexit and the Human Rights Act 1998. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm
Peep Beep has also examined the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgement in the joint cases C‑203/15 Tele2 Sverige AB v Postoch telestyrelsen and C‑698/15 Secretary of State for the Home Department v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm
We had a case comment from Dan Tench, there were also posts on the Panopticon Blog, the Scandalous! [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm
In the case of R (Ingenious Media) v HMRC ([2016] UKSC 54) UK Supreme Court held that information provided by taxpayers to HMRC is confidential and that HMRC acted unlawfully by disclosing such information to journalists. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:36 am
He met with Dan Tench and Lucy Hayes from the UKSC Blog Editorial Team to look back on his time on the bench and consider how the law has changed during his career. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
We had a post from Dan Tench who, in common, with most commentators thinks that the GDPR will govern data processing after Brexit. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:39 am
An Olswang team, headed by UKSC blog Editor, Dan Tench, is acting for Ingenious Media. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 5:02 am
The judge stated that “it is quite plain in my view that it is a “lifestyle” interview” and accepted that he had “no authority in that capacity to make statements”. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:08 pm
Part 1 – Adrienne Page QC Case Law: OPO v James Rhodes (formerly MLA): Pianist’s book unbanned, no intention to cause distress – Dan Tench Case Law: Mosley v Google Inc, Data Protection claim against Google to go to trial – Lorna Skinner Privacy Issues in New Zealand: Sex with the Office Lights on – Nicole Moreham Case Law: Vidal-Hall v Google, Distress damages can be awarded under s 13 DPA without pecuniary loss (and misuse of… [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 8:06 am
Article V required a call when two-thirds of the states applied for (demanded) it. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 4:40 pm
The judge also stated that if the defendant were to become aware of other material which he wished to publish and considered that he should be permitted to do so, it was open to him to apply to vary the order. [read post]
