Search for: "State v. Tincher" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Not only did [the third lawsuit] represent a third claim of excessive force against Officer Tincher, but the allegations regarding Tincher’s actions against [that plaintiff] were strikingly similar to Morgan’s own allegations against Tincher. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Tincher’ Altered the Law (Somewhat)Back in 2014, when the Pennsylvania Supreme Court released its much-anticipated products liability decision in the case of Tincher v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
”  Op at p. 18.The TincherSuperior Court went on to state, “Here, the trial court gave a charge on a determinative issue that failed to conform to the applicable law, as stated in Tincher. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Section 8371.The Supreme Court adopted the two-part test enunciated in the case of Terletsky v. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In its recent post-Tincher decision in the case of High v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 6:25 am by tortsprof
In late 2014, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decided Tincher v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  To the contrary, the court stated that both prongs of Tincher’s composite risk/utility and consumer expectation tests are ordinarily to be decided by the jury. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Notably, Judge Brann also cited to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s recent decision in the Tincher v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:00 pm
  The same result was also reached (albeit without citing Tincher) in Runner v. [read post]