Search for: "State v. Two Bulls" Results 1 - 20 of 1,154
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am by Frank Cranmer
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:16 am by Marcel Pemsel
Concerning the correspondence between the colour sample and the description, the Court referred to Red Bull v EUIPO (case C-124/18 P, IPKat here), in which the CJEU found that the description must serve to clarify the subject matter and scope of protection sought. [read post]
The HKEX stated that issuers’ boards that are only composed by members of one gender will be in contravention of its Listing Rules. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 11:26 am by Stephen E. Sachs
And it didn't fix the size of the Senate: it said to take the actual number of states, and multiply by two. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
So far as I could tell, it was decisive in only two contests in the last five decades (Denver Nuggets over the Bucks in 1978 and the Chicago Bulls over the Miami Heat in 2009). [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am by Ryan Goodman
Classic, 313 U.S. 299 (1941); destroy ballots, United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 12:15 pm
  Since the endorsement of the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights in 2011 (A/HRC/RES/17/4), the Human Rights Council has attached to that project two related things. [read post]