Search for: "State v. Urbina"
Results 1 - 20
of 48
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
Other states Mis-classification of gig workers has been a major issue in numerous states. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 3:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Urbina v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:55 am
In Urbina v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:25 am
In Urbina v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Holder, 740 F.3d 902 (4th Cir. 2014); Urbina-Mejia v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Holder, 740 F.3d 902 (4th Cir. 2014); Urbina-Mejia v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 8:07 am
” Similarly, in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:54 am
Supreme Court stripped tribal governments of their criminal authority over non-Indians in Oliphant v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 9:16 am
Urbina, 2013 U.S. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 10:41 am
Here they are for those interested: 1) United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:33 am
Holder, 589 F.3d 426, 430-31 (7th Cir. 2009) (denouncing the BIA's insistence on "social visibility," sometimes in its literal form, and charging the BIA might not understand the difference between visibility in a social sense and the external criterion sense); Urbina-Mejia v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 7:44 am
District Judge Ricardo Urbina in Washington ruled for the government in March 2010, upholding the city's handgun restrictions. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:20 am
Sullivan quotes from the case’s opinion, which was written by District Judge Ricardo Urbina. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 6:37 am
The case, New York v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:14 pm
District Judges Rosemary Collyer and Ricardo Urbina, sitting with Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
Judge Ricardo Urbina denied his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 3:02 pm
In Kastigar v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
URBINA, District Judge. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:14 pm
Circuit affirms Judge Ricardo Urbina’s decision in Hatim v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:43 pm
Raymond Randolph, and Stephen Williams will hear oral argument in Hatim v. [read post]
