Search for: "State v. Wiltshire"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2024, 11:04 am
Ashley Wiltshire, Everyday Justice: A Legal Aid Story (2023). 42. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am
The appellant had sought information concerning the Novichok poisonings in Wiltshire from the South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust. [read post]
30 May 2022, 1:00 am
Six Clutterbuck windows are in Wiltshire, including the one at Tisbury church. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 11:35 am
Robert Half Corp., No. 2:15-cv-06245, order (D.N.J., Feb. 21, 2017); Wiltshire v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
Her position was “directly comparable” to that of the claimants in Gorry v Wiltshire County Council (heard alongside Burnip). [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 4:23 am
Each tenancy agreement stated that a deposit had been paid. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 pm
An embassy, with the earl of Wiltshire at its head, was dispatched to Rome in 1530, and Cranmer was an important member of it. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:19 am
The Keynote speech [pdf] by Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, John Whittingdale MP. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm
In Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy, the CJEU stated that use that does not create an impression of commercial connection or take unfair advantage of the earlier mark’s distinctive character or repute will be considered honest practice. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am
The Secretary of State and Somerset appealed to the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 2:28 am
Lord Carnwath stated that until he turned eighteen, for fiscal and administrative purposes, his ordinary residence continued to be in Wiltshire, regardless of where they determined that he should live, including placing him in foster care in South Gloucestershire. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:00 am
The facts Philip was born on 27 December 1986 in Wiltshire. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
Opposition is growing over State Government plans to extend defamation laws. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:59 am
Like every other court in New York State, Supreme Court may not convict a defendant of a felony absent compliance with the indictment and waiver of indictment provisions in article I, § 6 of the New York Constitution as was held in People v Wiltshire. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm
Writing in the Guardian Patrick Butler pointed out that whereas the recent turnaround which saw families with disabled children being exempted was vaunted as a gesture towards decency and common sense, it was in fact the case that the government had been forced into an embarrassing climb down in the case of Gorry v Wiltshire and the Secretary of State where they fought tooth and nail to not have disabled children exempted. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]
19 May 2012, 1:36 pm
Burnip v. [read post]
