Search for: "Steele v. Heard" Results 1 - 20 of 287
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2024, 11:43 am by Dylan Gibbs
He ordered Steel to serve 10 weekends in jail.Steel put himself in the running for lawyer of the decade when he asked to serve his sentence in the same jail as his client, so he could keep working on the case.Lawyer: I heard you had a secret meeting with the stateJudge: I heard you’re going to jail — Matt Margolis (@ItsMattsLaw) Jun 11, 2024 PRACTICESuing clients for bad reviewsWhat happens when a lawyer threatens to sue a client over a bad review? [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 8:37 am by Will Baude
I've benefited from much thoughtful commentary about last week's arguments in Trump v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Steele was responsible for overseeing the Russia desk at MI6 before retiring in 2009. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Peltz-Steele, Richard J., TORTZ Volume 2: A Study of American Tort Law (Chapters 9 to 15) (2023), 2 Tortz: A Study of American Tort Law (Lulu 2024). [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:37 am by Alex Phipps
Steele, 190 N.C. 506 (1925), “holds flight, and flight alone, is not evidence of premeditation and deliberation. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
On 16 October 2023, Steyn J heard applications in the case of Trump v Orbis Business Intelligence. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
On Monday 9 October 2023 Johnson J heard a pre-trial review in the case of Dyson v MGN Limited. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 3:43 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[South African Iron and Steel Institute and Others v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others [2023] ZACC 18 (26 June 2023)] [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm by Chijioke Okorie
Cochrane Steel owns various trade marks including CLEAR VU.November: It was a cut-and-dried case of trade infringement and passing-off in Hendler & Hart (Pty) Ltd v BV Cookware (Pty) Ltd where the defendant was found to be selling kitchenware products in packaging bearing a mark closely resembling the applicant’s HART trade marks.In December, the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa directed the respondent in Dart Industries Incorporated and another v Botle… [read post]