Search for: "Stein Physicians" Results 1 - 20 of 93
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Lawmakers who are physicians are using their medical backgrounds to persuade colleagues to scale back some of the more restrictive and punitive portions of anti-abortion laws being considered. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 8:43 am by Leslie Francis
Michael Ashley Stein, Ph.D., J.D., is the co-founder and Executive Director of the Harvard Law School Project on Disability, and a Visiting Professor at Harvard Law School since 2005. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am by Eugene Volokh
Supp. 3d 1134, 1148-49 (D.N.D. 2019) (as to requirement that physicians inform patients that the effects of abortion-inducing drugs are reversible). [3.] [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 12:50 pm by Tom Lamb
Physicians should counsel patients on risk of ocular complication in long term and high dose [Elmiron] use, and consider alternative therapies and early ophthalmologic referral in patients with lifetime cumulative doses [of Elmiron] greater than 500 g. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 3:08 pm by luiza
The kickbacks were designed to encourage Stein and 1523 Holdings to exploit new telemedicine amendments enacted during the pandemic to offer physicians access to Medicare beneficiaries. [read post]
29 May 2020, 11:50 am by luiza
According to DOJ, Faber’s company then fraudulently billed the government for services that were medically unnecessary or in the names of physicians who had no role in the assessments. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
But in taking their cause to politicians, physicians have waged an on-the-ground stealth campaign to win over members of Congress. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Carolina Attorneys
Attorney General Josh Stein, by Special Deputy Attorney General Keith Clayton, for the State-Appellee. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:46 am by SHG
The privilege predated this nation, and was explained 180 years ago by the United States Supreme Court in Stein v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm by Bill Marler
I was reading on Food Safety News, “Yuma romaine growers hopeful harvest will end without E. coli issues” https://www.foodsafetynews.com/2019/03/yuma-romaine-growers-hopeful-harvest-will-end-without-e-coli-issues/ today and could not help but think that what was missing was a story of a customer. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:36 am by Bill Marler
I was reading on Food Safety News, “Yuma romaine growers hopeful harvest will end without E. coli issues” https://www.foodsafetynews.com/2019/03/yuma-romaine-growers-hopeful-harvest-will-end-without-e-coli-issues/ and could not help but think that what was missing was a story of a customer. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:37 am by ohioemployersinjurylawblog
April 9, 2018) the 6th District considered an FMLA/ERISA action brought by an employee who was terminated after failing to show up for work after the physician treating him for a work-related injury released him to light-duty. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Tamar Frankel
The balance between trusting and verifying depends on the client/entrustor’s need to trust and their ability to verify.We must trust a surgeon to perform an operation more than we need to trust a physician who merely provides prospective advice about the surgery, in large part because the latter physician’s advice is still subject to our final decision. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 9:48 am by Eugene Volokh
Stein, disagrees with Rivera, arguing that “The legitimate interests advanced by the State support the assisted suicide statutes irrespective of a patient’s proximity to death or eligibility for terminal sedation. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Lapat, Esquire of the Philadelphia law firm of Stein & Silverman, P.C. for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
The Motor Vehicle Accident, Death and TextingThis post examines a recent opinion the Supreme Court -Genesee County, New York issued in a civil case: Vega v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by Steve Lubet
  In the latest episode, which is now approaching cover-up proportions, The Lancet, which published the original study, has refused even to publish a critical letter that was submitted by 43 highly credentialed U.S. researchers, physicians, and scientists. [read post]