Search for: "Stevens v. Doe et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 343
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 7:42 am
The case is Carlyle Aviation Partners LLC et al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
However, following self-interest does not automatically yield socially positive results when not channeled into productive work and investments that predictably redound to collective well-being. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Tex. 2001). [7] See Torben Andersen et al., A Descriptive Study of High-Frequency Trade and Quote Options Data, 19 J. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 1:45 pm
McCraw, Director, Texas Department Of Public Safety, et al. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:20 am
Research Methodology Much of the data and analysis presented in the article by Barrero et al., are taken from the authors’ own study, the U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
Recognizing the worst in government transparency. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Winter was coming, as it does. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
V. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
– ESTATE OF ASHLI BABBITT) COUNT V Negligent Training (Capitol Police, Capitol Police Board, et al. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 4:53 am
Steven McCraw, et. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 9:51 am
., et al. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
Constitution does not recognize a fundamental right to education, which leaves all types of learning, including civic education, without this support (San Antonio ISD v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm
It is noteworthy that the PRA does not provide any cause of action against the agency on the ground that the agency made errors on its estimate.[11] The most that can happen is that if the OMB does not approve it, the agency is unable to enforce the regulation.[12] What types of costs, then, would not be included in the SEC’s paperwork burden estimate? [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm
Gatekeeping in federal court does not always go well, as for example in the Avandia mass tort, discussed above. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Cheng does not explain why, under his proposed “consensus rule,” subject matter experts are needed at all. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:26 pm
From the per curiam in today's Tucker v. [read post]
