Search for: "Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. City of Stockton" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Reversal of Misfortune: Second District Holds CEQA Action Challenging Los Angeles Housing Development Project Barred By Statute of Limitations, Reverses Trial Court Judgment Rejecting MND and Requiring EIR
29 Jan 2024, 8:41 am by Arthur F. Coon
The Court of Appeal’s Opinion In reviewing de novo the issue whether petitioners’ action was time-barred, the Court observed that CEQA requires untimely actions to be dismissed (citing CEQA Guidelines, § 15112(b); Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Sixth District Affirms Judgment Dismissing CEQA Action For Failure To Timely Join Indispensable Real Party Within Limitations Period Triggered By Filing of Second, Valid NOD; Court Rejects Plaintiff’s Arguments Based On Relation Back, Estoppel, and City’s Violation of Statute Requiring It To Mail Operative NOD
1 Jun 2021, 8:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
” (Citing Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Third District Dismisses Appeal In CEQA Case As Moot Where Plaintiff Failed To Timely Seek Or Obtain Preliminary Injunction And Project Construction Was Completed Before Trial
21 Sep 2020, 1:26 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  (E.g., Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Second District Reaffirms Rule That Filing of Facially Valid NOD Triggers Short CEQA Statute of Limitations And Plaintiff May Not “Go Behind” Agency’s Declarations In Document To Challenge Validity of Project Approval
9 Apr 2020, 2:11 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Santa Clara County Bd. of Supervisors (2010) 48 Cal.4th 32, 43 [NODs]; Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Government Code Section 65009’s 90-day Statute Of Limitations Period For Land Use Claims Applies To Delegated Decisions Made By Subordinate Agencies And Departments, Not Just Legislative Bodies
10 Apr 2019, 10:05 pm by William W. Abbott
Relying upon Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Discovery Rule Does Not Postpone Accrual of CEQA Cause of Action; Events Specified In CEQA Statute of Limitations Provide Constructive Notice of Project Approval or Commencement
26 Jul 2016, 10:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
” (Citing Stockton Citizens For Sensible Planning v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Supreme Engagement: CEQA’s Continuing Saga In California’s High Court
5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The filing of a facially-valid Notice of Exemption (NOE) triggers a 35-day statute of limitations (Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
How CEQA’s Administrative Record Preparation Process Could Be Reformed By Eliminating CEQA Petitioners’ Statutory Option To Prepare The Record
11 Feb 2015, 11:51 am by Arthur F. Coon
Superior Court (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 1, 13 [CEQA petitioners, as the parties “with the most to gain from any underinclusion,” bear “the burden of showing prejudice from any overinclusion of materials into the administrative record”]; Stockton Citizens For Sensible Planning v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Undisclosed Change in Building Height Requires Supplemental EIR
30 Jan 2015, 3:57 pm by Jeffrey Forrest and Tiffany Duong
  This approach would seem to be more in keeping with the California Supreme Court’s determination in Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
Real Estate and Construction Law Blog - http://www.realestatelanduseandenvironmentallaw.com/
First District Holds CEQA Statute Of Limitations Bars Citizens Group’s Challenge To College Of San Mateo Tree Cutting
23 Jun 2014, 10:20 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Quoting Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Zoning Director Approval Triggers Section 65009 Statute of Limitations
29 Nov 2012, 1:30 am
Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
Real Estate and Construction Law Blog - http://www.realestatelanduseandenvironmentallaw.com/
Further Confirmation Notice of Exemption Filed Before Project Approval is Void
30 Oct 2012, 1:57 am
However, it confirms the principle set forth in the recent California Supreme Court’s Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
Real Estate and Construction Law Blog - http://www.realestatelanduseandenvironmentallaw.com/
Timing Is Everything: CEQA Notice of Exemption Must Be Both Facially Valid And Properly Filed To Trigger Short Limitations Period
19 Sep 2012, 1:56 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The Court harmonized its holding with the language of the Supreme Court in Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Timing Is Everything: CEQA Notice of Exemption Must Be Both Facially Valid And Properly Filed To Trigger Short Limitations Period
19 Sep 2012, 1:56 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  The Court harmonized its holding with the language of the Supreme Court in Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Are Courts Actively Limiting CEQA’s Scope In The Absence of Meaningful Legislative Reform?
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Are Courts Actively Limiting CEQA’s Scope In The Absence of Meaningful Legislative Reform?
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am by Arthur F. Coon
Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2010 CEQA UPDATE
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Santee v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2010 MID-YEAR CEQA UPDATE
29 Jun 2010, 10:43 am by Abbott & Kindermann
See City's New General Plan is not Cleared for Take-off, Returns to Base and is Grounded. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Notice Of Exemption Triggers A 35-Day Statute Of Limitations Under CEQA Despite Flaws in Underlying Approval
30 Apr 2010, 3:07 pm
Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
Real Estate and Construction Law Blog - http://www.realestatelanduseandenvironmentallaw.com/
No Fooling: A Facially Valid NOE Triggers a 35-Day Statute of Limitations
12 Apr 2010, 10:31 am by Abbott & Kindermann
In Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/