Search for: "Stokes v. Williams"
Results 1 - 20
of 72
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during April 2024 The thirteen consistory court judgments circulated in April included: Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials Organs Fonts Also included are: CDM Decisions and Safeguarding; Reports from the Independent Reviewer; Privy Council Business; Other legal issues; CFCE Determinations; and Links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during February 2024 Nine consistory court judgments were circulated in 2024 including: Procedure Churchyards and burials Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials Also included are: Privy Council Business; Other legal issues; Visitations; CFCE Determinations; and Links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
Part V reexamines case law that Blackman and Tillman rely on. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Two scholars who are not here are William Baude of the University of Chicago law school and Michael Stokes Paulsen of the University of St. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
William H. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am
Supreme Court, Colorado Republican State Central Committee v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
If the Supreme Court were to rely on the concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
In a new article, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen argue that the answer is yes because “essentially all the evidence concerning the original textual meaning of Section Three . . . points in the same direction . . . . [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm
[A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen ] Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote a new draft article, titled Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am
The authors are two highly conservative, leading legal scholars, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
That SSRN/Penn Law Review article by William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen on DJT's disqualification under the 14th Amendment is getting some traction in the popular media (Time, NYT, The Conversation). [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Freedman Presidential Professor, Dartmouth College) and Susan Stokes (Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor, University of Chicago) “The Destructive Effects of President Trump’s Effort to Overturn the 2020 Election”Expert Statement Anthea Butler (Geraldine R. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
SEC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Nasir Mehmood v Up and Coming TV Ltd [2023] EWHC 1426 (KB) by Heather Williams J. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 12:15 am
" William Stokes, "The address in medicine'", Br. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
On 21 July 2022, the BBC offered a public apology and agreed to pay damages to the former nanny of Prince William and Prince Harry following the “fabricated” and “false and malicious” allegations made by Martin Bashir that Tiggy Legge-Bourke, now Alexandra Pettifer, had an affair with Prince Charles, in order to secure his world-famous 1995 interview with Princess Diana. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:02 pm
The decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
” Any number of other sorts of claims may contribute to effective constitutional advocacy at a remove, as by eliciting sympathy, stoking outrage, or calling attention to certain practical or normative variables. [read post]
