Search for: "Straub v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 138
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Judd, “Redistributive taxation in a simple perfect foresight model,” Journal of Public Economics 28 (1985). [2] For recent discussion of the Chamley and Judd results, see Ludwig Straub and Iván Werning,  “Positive Long-Run Capital Taxation: Chamley-Judd Revisited,” American Economic Review 110:1 (2020), and Varadajan V. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
By email dated May 9, 2013, Harris sent copies of the deed to the property, the first and final pages of the trust agreement, and an appraisal of the property’s fair market value to Steven Frushtick, ARG’s accountant at defendant Wiener Frushtick & Straub (WPS), stating that “only 50% of the house” had been transferred to the trust. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 10:10 am by Austin B. Calhoun, Esq.
Straub Capital Corp., 682 So.2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (final furnishing of mantel occurred when modified mantel was re-delivered after mantel initially tendered was rejected as non-confirming to contract for materials; contract could not be considered complete until satisfactory product delivered) ; compare Cross State Dev. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
Francoeur, on the brief), Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, New York, N.Y., for Midland Funding, LLC and Midland Credit Management, Inc.Before: LEVAL, STRAUB and DRONEY, Circuit Judges.STRAUB, Circuit Judge:This putative class action alleges violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA") and New York's usury law. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 6:09 am by John Jascob
Over one judge’s dissent, the appellate panel held that the Act prohibits only nonconsensual amendments to an indenture’s core payment terms (Marblegate Asset Management, LLC. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 7:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In the end, the Second Circuit (Kearse and Straub with Wesley in dissent) says, the State Court of Appeals did not reasonably apply settled constitutional law in upholding the conviction. [read post]