Search for: "Strauss v. Cir" Results 1 - 20 of 89
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
Reeves, 961 F.3d 800, 801 (5th Cir. 2020) (Costa, J., concurring & Willet, J., concurring in the judgment) Biden v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 3:54 pm
Levi Strauss & Co., 986 F.2d 970, 976 n. 4 (5th Cir.1993)). [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:34 pm by centerforartlaw
Keppler is a partner at Pierro, Connor & Strauss. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am by Marty Lederman
Circuit case, on behalf of Professors Walter Dellinger, Bill Eskridge and David Strauss, arguing that the House lacks standing to sue on such an Appropriations Clause claim. [read post]