Search for: "Street v. United Parcel Service, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
W.C.A.B. (1983) 33 Cal. 3d 585, to find the employer liable even though the violent incident, which resulted in applicant’s death, occurred on a public street after applicant finished work. [read post]
In the NOE, Caltrans asserted that the project was statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to Streets & Highways Code section 103 and Public Resources Code sections 21080.5(c) and 21080.9. [read post]
In the NOE, Caltrans asserted that the project was statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to Streets & Highways Code section 103 and Public Resources Code sections 21080.5(c) and 21080.9. [read post]
In the NOE, Caltrans asserted that the project was statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to Streets & Highways Code section 103 and Public Resources Code sections 21080.5(c) and 21080.9. [read post]
In the NOE, Caltrans asserted that the project was statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to Streets & Highways Code section 103 and Public Resources Code sections 21080.5(c) and 21080.9. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
But once you start parceling out Thomas’ arguments in that way, you miss not only the life story but also the underlying political and ideological consistency of his thought. [read post]
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 11:30 pm by Barry Sookman
United Parcel Service Canada Ltd., 2018 ONSC 2946 Computer Associates UK Ltd v The Software Incubator Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 518 (19 March 2018) Great Minds v Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc (2nd.Cir, Mr. 21, 2018) Oracle USA, Inc v Rimini Street, Inc. (9th.Cir.Jan. 8, 2018) Privacy Toronto Real Estate Board v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The originally proposed 72-unit, 12,800 square-foot retail/gallery project fell 61 parking spaces short of City’s standard requirements  (and 84 spaces short if assumed available street parking was not counted). [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 9:17 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Quoting Banning Ranch, 211 Cal.App.4th at 1223, and citing as example Tuolumne County Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:19 am by Edith Roberts
The second case on the argument docket is Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 9:23 am by Jennifer Parent
United Parcel Service, Inc. issued in March 2015, the weight placed on guidance should be based upon “the thoroughness evident in its consideration, the validity of its reasoning, its consistency with earlier and later pronouncements, and all those factors that give it power to persuade, if lacking power to control. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
Kent Recycling Services, LLC v. [read post]