Search for: "Strickland v. State of Georgia*"
Results 1 - 20
of 77
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2022, 7:09 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit violated basic principles of Strickland v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm
Texas, a capital defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
The United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:02 am
Texas, 18-9674 Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:30 am
Strickland, 420 U.S. 308 (1975), and Pierson v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:54 pm
Sellers involves a Georgia Supreme Court decision in a capital case on the "prejudice" prong of Strickland v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:16 am
As to the harm prong of Strickland, the Court finds a reasonable probability that a jury would have accepted a proper presentation of mental health defense. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:11 pm
Although the district court denied relief (concluding that Wilson could not demonstrate “prejudice” under the Supreme Court’s Strickland v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:38 pm
Instead, the defendant must show “prejudice” under a reading of Strickland v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 11:43 am
Still, the odd facts of Weaver v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 6:58 am
On appeal, the individual argued that the district court improperly deviated from the bright-line permissive use standard set forth in the Georgia Supreme Court’s 1968 Strickland v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 10:47 pm
Oral argument in State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am
Another state-on-top habeas petition and likely second relist from the Sixth Circuit is Cook v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
And while the Sunflower State won big this week in Kansas v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 2:23 pm
V. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 2:00 pm
THE CASE The decision in Strickland v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 6:18 am
Except Strickland v. [read post]
