Search for: "Strike 3 Holdings, LLC et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 95
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2013, 8:33 am
IP Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 5:21 pm
A number if issues raised in the Complaint in the matter of " The People of the State of New York by ELIOT SPITZER Attorney General of The State of New York v Coventry First, LLC et al. should be sending chills down the backs of "structured settlement factoring vig takers". [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 6:15 am
Phoenix Intangibles Holding Company et al. v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:19 am
Rahman, et al. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:19 am
Rahman, et al. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:22 am
City of Los Angeles, et al (The Icon at Panorama, LLC, Real Party in Interest) (2022) 76 Cal.App.5th 1154. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:24 pm
Vandergriff, et al., US 5th Cir. (7/14/14)Civil Rights, Constitutional LawPlaintiff filed suit alleging that the Board violated its First Amendment right to free speech when it denied plaintiff’s application for a specialty license plate featuring the Confederate battle flag. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 10:19 am
For publication opinions today (5): Frank Nagy, et al. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:42 am
RE/MAX, LLC et al. v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:47 am
DCH & Associates, LLC et al. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 9:13 am
Bowman (SD (11/09/2022) – A Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference is scheduled for April 3, 2023. 1.4G Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:55 pm
Curragh, et al. | 2013 | $500,000 Settlement. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 11:00 am
Yet in the ongoing case, Conor Woulfe et al v. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
ADB Utility Contractors, Inc. (14-CA-27386, et al.; 348 NLRB No. 53) St. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 5:10 am
§ 13-8-51 et al. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 4:22 am
Sandoz, Inc. et al (Docket Report) [read post]
12 May 2023, 4:57 pm
City and County of San Francisco, et al. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
(Docket Report) (271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Defendant may not present jury argument concerning KSR’s change to obviousness standard: Datatreasurycorp v Wells Fargo & Co et al (Docket Report) District Court E Texas: Entire operating system cannot serve as royalty base where only the workspace switching feature is accused of infringement: IP Innovation, LLC. et al v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:01 am
” Chief Justice O’Connor, to counsel for Joni Bey and Becky Rasawehr On February 11, 2020 the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Joni Bey, et al. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
(Docket Report) (271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Defendant may not present jury argument concerning KSR’s change to obviousness standard: Datatreasurycorp v Wells Fargo & Co et al (Docket Report) District Court E Texas: Entire operating system cannot serve as royalty base where only the workspace switching feature is accused of infringement: IP Innovation, LLC. et al v. [read post]