Search for: "Strong v. Boston et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
For the Balkinization Symposium on Alison L. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
Anyway, the now 32-year-old owner of the then-four-month-old penis depicted in the photo has sued Nirvana et al., alleging that the naked baby photo is child pornography. [read post]
29 May 2023, 7:15 am
Lynn Goldsmith, et al., No. 21-869, Brief for Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioner (U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Selikoff arrived in Boston from Yarmouth, Nova Scotia, on the S.S. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Complaint ¶ 1, Alianza Americas v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
Their conclusion: tax increases have a strong contractionary effect on the economy. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 5:43 am
Two years later, he received the title of Count of Superunda (Superunda means “over the waves”) for his efforts in rebuilding the city of Lima and its port, which had been destroyed by an earthquake and a tsunami in 1746 (Mas et al., 10). [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm
Finer et al., Reasons U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Not only should the First Amendment apply to the publication by Assange of Manning leaks – after all such publication was not dissimilar from that of the New York Times, the Guardian, et. al. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:06 pm
In Vazquez, et al. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 6:56 pm
And surely, given that no one is suggesting that Governor et al are unconstitutional because they did not go through the process specified in the Appointments clause, the Appointments clause must not apply to Puerto Rico (and other territories). [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am
The state benefits from a strong manufacturing base and an educated workforce. [read post]
20 May 2018, 9:03 am
In Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 3:29 pm
First, in Goldman v Breitbart et al., a federal court in New York bucked years of settled precedent and ruled [PDF] that you can infringe copyright simply by embedding a tweet in a web page. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:21 am
In FTI, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Melissa Ramirez, et. al. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
In particular, on 8 March 2017 campaigning group 38 Degrees delivered a 300,000-strong petition to the Culture Secretary supporting a reference. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
The most striking example of apparently mistaken incontestability comes from B&B v. [read post]
