Search for: "TAYLOR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" Results 1 - 20 of 155
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
By Atreya Mathur ​​In a world where creativity knows no bounds and the lines between art, inspiration and infringement blur, one art collective stands at the forefront of pushing these boundaries. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Scott Perry by the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals, which has heard litigation over special counsel Jack Smith’s effort to access the communications stored on Perry’s cell phone. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit heard arguments in the government’s appeal of a decision to toss civil claims against Wynn. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decision puts a hold on the limited gag order to give the judges time to consider Trump’s request for a longer pause on the restrictions while his appeals play out. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
 On the same day there was a hearing in the case of Taylor v Crouch and another before Nicklin J. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Imagine, for example, Marjorie Taylor Greene as a district attorney, reviewing a speech by President Biden! [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:10 am by jonathanturley
That was before the Supreme Court recognized that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to gun ownership in District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:21 pm by Cary Coglianese
District Court for the Western District of Washington; Mary Saunders of ANSI; Peter L. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Canada The claimant’s defamation claim was struck out in Skyllar v The University of British Columbia 2022 BCSC 439. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
District Court for the District of Columbia that the information sought by the committee “is relevant only to serve the Select Committee’s stated purpose of engaging in ad-hoc law enforcement and its unstated purpose of antagonizing its political adversaries. [read post]