Search for: "Taub v. Taub" Results 1 - 20 of 84
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm by Ilana Korchia
Hepatitis A outbreaks associated with fresh, frozen, and minimally processed produce, worldwide, from 1983 to 2016—adapted and expanded from Sivapalasingam et al., 2004 and Fiore, 2004. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 6:51 pm by Bill Marler
As of May 31, 2022, a total of 18 outbreak-associated cases of hepatitis A have been reported from 3 states – California (16), Minnesota (1), and North Dakota (1). [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:09 am by Bill Marler
Officials in New Zealand investigating Hepatitis A cases linked to berries have identified a connection with a past outbreak in Europe. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by admin
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, even if defendant’s failure to perfect an appeal may have been sufficient to plead a breach of duty, plaintiff’s allegations failed to establish that but for such failure he would have been successful on the appeal (see Hutt v Kanterman & Taub, 280 AD2d 379, 379 [1st Dept 2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 713 [2001]). [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 2:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, even if defendant’s failure to perfect an appeal may have been sufficient to plead a breach of duty, plaintiff’s allegations failed to establish that but for such failure he would have been successful on the appeal (see Hutt v Kanterman & Taub, P.C., 280 AD2d 379, 379 [1st Dept 2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 713 [2001]). [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 10:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
  As each workshop approaches, we will send an email to those on our list with details concerning location and/or accessibility via Zoom.Oct. 19, 2021: Mark Krass, Stanford Law and Political ScienceDebunking the Non-Delegation Doctrine for State Regulation of Federal ElectionsNov. 2, 2021: Margarita Lila Rosa, Lecturer and Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow, Stanford Marginalia: Black Women and Emerging Carceral Geographies in Rio de Janeiro, 1880-1888Nov. 16, 2021: Sara Forsdyke, Classical… [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm by Vercammen Law
 Rooming House Act did not apply to Assisted Living Facility here ESTATE OF JAMES BURNS, by and through BRIAN BURNS, EXECUTOR,v CARE ONE AT STANWICK, LLC d/b/a CARE ONE HARMONY VILLAGE AT MOORESTOWN and CARE ONE, LLC,SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISIONDOCKET NO. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:32 am by James Romoser
On the second day of the Supreme Court’s new term, the justices heard arguments in Rutledge v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by James Romoser
Pennsylvania and Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]