Search for: "Taylor v. Commissioner of Correction"
Results 1 - 20
of 86
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Firm leaders need to be sensitive to the message such arrangements could send and stand ready to correct any such misimpressions. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Hasson, Taylor A.R. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Hasson, Taylor A.R. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am
State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
Last Week in the Courts On Wednesday 25 October 2023 there was a committal hearing in the case of Kent Police v Taylor before Steyn J. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) issued a formal reprimand to the NHS in Lanarkshire for reportedly sharing patient data over WhatsApp. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Taylor v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am
In direct contradistinction to the Rustat case, this was an attempt to correct a false narrative of the life of Edward Colston. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Part of Just Security’s work on accountability and election law. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 8:56 am
According to the rulemaking petition, the soon-to-be-argued Supreme Court case Slack Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am
Araba Taylor: “The Case of the Rustat Memorial – Does Duffield Pose all the Right Questions? [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 9:06 am
Commissioner of Correction and Greenfield v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, who fended off her own Section 3 challenge, won her primary with nearly 70 percent of the vote. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
Information Commissioner’s Office said a breach notification was reviewed and it was determined no further action was needed. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 6:48 pm
Reg. 82/20 of the Act in Hudson’s Bay Company ULC v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 29978-20 Abdelrahman v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 29766-20 Cohen v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 28966-20 Harrison v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), 8 Hospitals (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 28402-20 Jamalli v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 12214-20… [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
It was not until 1961, in Monroe v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
