Search for: "Taylor v. Levine"
Results 1 - 20
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2024, 10:23 am
” Cariou v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009) Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Just as the Federal Reserve credits Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour for boosting the tourism industry and the overall economy, Swift and Beyoncé’s Renaissance World Tour have been a means for lawmakers to boost their own campaign coffers. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Menendez Indictment Revives Concerns Over Money and Influence in Politics Yahoo News – Taylor Giorno (The Hill) | Published: 10/11/2023 U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
That ruling--and especially the opinion of then-Court President Aharon Barak--has sometimes been called the Marbury v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 2:25 pm
Jacob Levin summarized the D.C. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The majority in Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm
The Evan Law blog has a summary of the recent decision Allen v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Archer, Byington, Glennon & Levine LLP, Melville, NY (Alexandra J. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Archer, Byington, Glennon & Levine LLP, Melville, NY (Alexandra J. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
Archer, Byington, Glennon & Levine LLP, Melville, NY(Alexandra J. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
Archer, Byington, Glennon & Levine LLP, Melville, NY(Alexandra J. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 4:56 am
There is no basis other than speculation to support the allegation that, had defendants attorneys, who represented plaintiff client in an underlying action, served notice of entry sooner, the adverse party would not have sought leave to appeal (see Levine v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, 256 AD2d 147, 149 [1st Dept 1998]). [read post]
5 May 2021, 3:48 am
There is no basis other than speculation to support the allegation that, had defendants attorneys, who represented plaintiff client in an underlying action, served notice of entry sooner, the adverse party would not have sought leave to appeal (see Levine v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor , 256 AD2d 147, 149 [1st Dept 1998]). [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm
Beale v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 5:47 am
(See Levine v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, 256 AD2d 147, 149 [1st Dept 1998].) [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 5:40 am
Based on the foregoing, Lindenwood’s factual allegations fail to support the element of proximate cause (see Levine v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, 256 AD2d at 149-150; Gersh v Nixon Peabody LLP, 2017 NY Slip Op 30363[U], 2017 NY Misc LEXIS 682, * 18-19 [Sup Ct, NY County 2017]; Caso v Sklarin, 2016 NY Misc LEXIS 6863, * 12-13 [Sup Ct, NY County May 26, 2016, No. 159192/2015]). [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 6:39 am
” Margaret Taylor sat down with Scott R. [read post]