Search for: "Test v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 15,309
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 2:18 pm
In response, the European consortiums filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia challenging the TTAB decision. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm
I am doubtful that Justice Barrett would have joined United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:07 pm
In particular, we have to distinguish specific questions of original meaning from more general—and, here, more relevant—questions of original law: that is, the law of the United States as it stood at the Founding, and as it's been lawfully changed to the present day. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
In Sohm v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:02 am
Copan Italia S.p.A. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 1:59 pm
., filed a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am
United States TikTok and ByteDance have initiated legal action against the US government, challenging a recently enacted law that would ban TikTok unless ByteDance sells the company off in the next nine months to an entity not controlled by a foreign adversary. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:00 am
Facts – This case (Martin-Viana v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
., attorneys for amicus curiae New York State United Teachers, Christina M. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
., attorneys for amicus curiae New York State United Teachers, Christina M. [read post]
8 May 2024, 7:25 am
United States, 805 F.2d 372 (Fed. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Bass and Jonathan Glater of counsel), for The New York City Bar Association, amicus curiae.Moulton, J.The New York City public school system is the largest in the United States. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Bass and Jonathan Glater of counsel), for The New York City Bar Association, amicus curiae.Moulton, J.The New York City public school system is the largest in the United States. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:47 am
United States, 601 U.S. ____ (2024), the U.S. [read post]
7 May 2024, 8:47 am
Starbucks (10(j) Relief Standard): On April 23, 2024, oral argument before the United States Supreme Court took place in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am
Per another Supreme Court precedent, United States v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The FTC’s Allegations The FTC alleges that the proposed acquisition would violate the law in several ways: (i) it would result in the elimination of significant head-to-head competition between the handbag brands; (ii) it would significantly increase concentration in an alleged market for “accessible luxury” handbags in the United States; (iii) it would result in significant effects on the wages, benefits and working conditions of employees of the merging parties;… [read post]
