Search for: "The Active v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 18,122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 11:04 am by Barbara Moreno
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 43. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In the United States, however, the Alaska high court decision became an anomaly, not a trendsetter. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:53 am by JURIST Staff
Her activism commenced at the age of eighteen, when she challenged her father’s unjust imprisonment under martial law regulations in the landmark case “Miss Asma Jilani v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
" The court held for defendants, reasoning thus: Daniel's Law … was named for Daniel Anderl, the son of United States District Court Judge Esther Salas. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Thus, any marketing, advertising, and distributing activities that Abitron undertook in the United States were also “uses in commerce. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
As the United States is a party to these instruments, it must address the activities of vulture funds that violate the rights enshrined in them. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm by Marty Lederman
 Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 1973) (holding that Section 6(g) “empowered [the FTC] to promulgate substantive rules of business conduct”); United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 10:02 am by John Floyd
  Within this due process safeguard (made applicable to the states by the Fourteen Amendment), the “right to remain silent” was born in 1966 in Miranda v. [read post]