Search for: "The People v. Rogers"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,294
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
As a committed socialist, Egilman was incurious about how and why occupational and environmental diseases were so prevalent in socialist and communist countries, where profits are outlawed and the people own the means of production.[2] Like the radical labor historians David Rosner and Gerald Markowitz, Egilman tried to cram the history of silicosis (and even silicosis litigation) into a Marxist narrative of class conflict, economic reductionism, and capitalist greed. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
Trial in The People of the State of New York vs. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:01 pm
In Duncan v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
For instance, the 2017 case A.B v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
Nicholas Leicester [2024] ECC Lei 2 This judgment (which was preceded by three interim judgments with the neutral citations [2023] ECC Lei 1, [2023] ECC Lei 2 and [2023] ECC Lei 3, dealing with preliminary issues) relates to a petition for the introduction of a new altar frontal displaying the colours of the Progress Pride flag, the church having come to be regarded over time as a safe worshipping space for LGBTQIA+ people of faith. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
The Parliament Buildings at Stormont © 2024 Northern Ireland Assembly Commission For the entirety of its existence, Northern Ireland’s relationship within the United Kingdom has dominated its politics, its culture and its people. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
But if Rogers survives, that’s what it does. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
For Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:25 pm
Pearson v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
Q: Veuve Cliquot v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:24 pm
From Shen v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 1:04 pm
Related Cases: MGM v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
The ICO has fined two home improvement companies for marketing phone calls to people on the UK’s “do not call” register. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
This technicality has led to cases as absurd-sounding as United States of America v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
The concept made sense back in 1984, when the Supreme Court held in Chevron v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:44 am
The FBI and Capitol Police are investigating remarks reportedly made by Roger J. [read post]
