Search for: "The Entire Sixth Circuit Panel of Federal Officers" Results 1 - 20 of 122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2024, 10:41 am by Josh Blackman
It should be easy enough for the First Circuit to avoid putting the Lipezs on the same panel. [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
These disparities depend almost entirely on where they live. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
The first, the Sixth Circuit’s “authority or duty” test, required plaintiffs to prove “state action” by establishing that either (1) the “text of state law requires an officeholder to maintain a social-media account,” (2) the defendant official “use[s] … state resources” or “government staff” to run the account, or (3) the “accoun[t] belong[s] to an office, rather than an individual… [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 1:27 pm by John Ross
 Sixth Circuit: And they have standing to pursue their religious discrimination claim. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am by Alan Neff
Whitmer litigation; sanctions against six of the attorneys were completely affirmed recently by a panel of the federal Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am by Sasha Volokh
In a parallel Sixth Circuit challenge, the Sixth Circuit held that the new statute saved the Authority; meanwhile, the Fifth Circuit remanded to the district court for further consideration. [read post]
22 May 2023, 9:22 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The Sixth Circuit panel of Judges Boggs, Griffin and Murphy unanimously rejected Calcutts constitutional challenges to the FDIC's action, but split on the statutory claims. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[t]he panel decision is an insuperable obstacle to any plaintiff asserting any federal takings claim against any State in federal or state court. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am by Eric Goldman
  Sixth, assuming Woodward published copyrighted material without Trump’s authorization, was he permitted to do so, either as a fair use, or by the First Amendment? [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:16 am by Roger Parloff
That said, I concede that, if I were a defendant, these 16 jurors—now 15, because one was excused after catching the coronavirus—would not be my dream panel. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
In the process, the panel seemingly partially overturned the seminal Zeran v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Sixth Circuit (unpublished, over a dissent): The man's suit can proceed. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 7:21 am by John Elwood
’” The 2nd Circuit granted panel rehearing and issued a revised opinion that still held for Goldsmith; the opinion distinguished Google based on the “unusual context” of computer code and emphasized the visual similarity of Warhol’s work to Goldsmith’s. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Sixth Circuit: Violating jail policy isn't the same thing as violating the Constitution. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 1:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A claim might lie directly against such persons whether under federal law or the state law of trade defamation if they make a false and misleading statement. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Fifth Circuit (motions panel): We'll just let the merits panel decide whether they want to act on that. [read post]