Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Bryan" Results 1 - 20 of 392
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Bell as well as the anti-miscegenation statute at issue in Loving v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Will Baude
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:32 am by Camilla Hrdy
  On trade secrecy and privacy issues implicated by people using large language models like ChatGPT, I found Dave Levine's essay and this HJOLT note by Amy Winograd really helpful. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 7:11 pm by Ilya Somin
That would violate another longstanding rule of legal interpretation: the canon against superfluity, which, as Justice Scalia and Bryan Garner explain in Reading Law, requires courts to give effect to "every word and every provision" in a law and to ensure that "none should be needlessly given an interpretation that duplicates another provision" (quoting US v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm by Barry Barnett
An approach more aware of regular people’s concerns must therefore come from the agencies and their work in the courts. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:25 am by jonathanturley
Heller and its progeny lead us to conclude that Bryan Range remains among “the people” despite his 1995 false statement conviction. [read post]