Search for: "The Sally v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 246
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am by lawbod
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
Case date: 21 September 2023 Case number: No. 22-2658 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm by bndmorris
The class spent the entire semester on United States v. [read post]
Case date: 18 August 2023 Case number: No. 21-2904 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
Case date: 14 August 2023 Case number: No. 22-1839 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
Case date: 07 September 2023 Case number: No. 22-2821 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:13 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Importantly, today’s ruling does not impact NanoString’s legal ability to market or sell CosMx SMI products for protein detection in the European Union, nor does it impact the lawful selling of any NanoString CosMx SMI products in the United States, the United Kingdom or the rest of the world outside of the EU member states participating in the UPC system. [read post]
Case date: 09 May 2023 Case number: No. 22-1291 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 9:16 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
In a press release, Panasonic stated it expects ‘relevant actions will develop and proceed in parallel in Germany, the United Kingdom (UK), the newly established European Unified Patent Court (UPC) and China’. [read post]
Case date: 08 August 2023 Case number: No. 21-1813 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
The decision clarifies that a technical effect may be plausible without requiring the provision of tests or data; this is precisely the opposite of what was decided by Judge Arnold in the United Kingdom. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am by Guest Author
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that  “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 3:16 am by Kluwer IP Reporter
Read the full story here USPTO announces public hearing on trademark fee schedule The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has announced in a notice published in the Federal Register on 27 April 2023 that the Trademark Public Advisory Committee (TPAC) will hold a hybrid public meeting on 5 June 2023 from 1 to 3 p.m. [read post]