Search for: "Thomas Ackerman"
Results 1 - 20
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
Balkinization, Justice Thomas Denounces Wealth Taxation — At the Cost of Transforming “Originalism” into a Parody of Itself Bruce Ackerman (Yale), My Initial Reactions to Justice Thomas' Sweeping Denunciation of Wealth Taxation Joseph Fishkin (UCLA), Less Is Moore Bloomberg, A Covid Lifeline for Businesses Has Become Curse for the IRS... [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:31 pm
As Bruce Ackerman, Willy Forbath, and I argued in a brief in this case, Pollock was wrong the day it was decided, and the Sixteenth Amendment completely repudiated its wrong logic. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:24 am
Last summer, I wrote a blog about why just compensation—which is based on the ‘objective’ standard of what a property would sell for on the open market—shortchanges residential property owners subjected to eminent domain. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (2010). 72. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
This was the point of Justice Thomas’ very first question to Jason Murray, and it was a recurring theme throughout the argument. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Eventually, even James Madison and Thomas Jefferson repudiated their earlier Republican allies and came to agree with their Federalist counterparts on this issue. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
(Ackerman does not call himself an "originalist," but many of Ackerman's former students do work that is implicitly or explicitly originalist.) [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
Likewise, Bruce Ackerman and Gerard Magliocca have argued that Trump can be barred from the presidency if Congress declares that, by encouraging the attack on the Capitol, Trump engaged in “insurrection or rebellion. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
So is Bruce Ackerman’s dualist theory. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Anyone reading Federalist 1 might be forgiven for thinking that it was written by Thomas Jefferson (and not Alexander Hamilton) inasmuch as it is suffused with a faith in “the people” and their capacity for disciplined “reflection” and then wise “choice. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable on Law, Literature, and Other Performing Arts, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:30 am
Thomas Perroud, Susan Rose-Ackerman’s Democracy and Executive Power: A view from France6. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 6:30 am
Thomas Perroud, my co-author on much of the work that lies behind my discussion of the French case, strongly supports my normative argument but expresses pessimism about the likelihood that France will adopt the relevant reforms. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization symposium on Susan Rose-Ackerman, Democracy and Executive Power: Policymaking Accountability in the US, the UK, Germany, and France (Yale University Press, 2021).Thomas Perroud Susan Rose-Ackerman’s journey into the labyrinth of executive policymaking accountability includes our joint article comparing the French and US cases. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 6:00 am
This week at Balkinization we are hosting a symposium on Susan Rose-Ackerman's new book, Democracy and Executive Power: Policymaking Accountability in the US, the UK, Germany, and France (Yale University Press, 2021).We have assembled a terrific group of commentators, including John Ferejohn (NYU/Stanford), Liz Fisher (Oxford), Jeff King (UCL), Thomas Perroud (Panthéon-Assas University (Paris II), Mariana Prado (University of Toronto), Matthias Ruffert… [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:20 pm
" I preferred to cast my lot with Thomas Jefferson and Woodrow Wilson as vigorous critics of any such veneration. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 3:19 pm
Got a note from Bruce Ackerman at Yale Law School reiterating an important point that he has been making in talks all over the globe, this one at the invitation of the Thomas S. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 6:30 am
The Thomas S. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
Thomas Hendricks, an Indiana Democrat and future vice president, proposed limiting Section 3’s scope to individuals who engaged in covered conduct during their term in a triggering office, but the Senate rejected Hendricks’s proposal by an 8-to-34 vote. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 6:30 am
The right target is neither Ackerman nor conventional opinion, but a long “radical” tradition in political theory stretching from Thomas Hobbes in the 17th century through Emmanuel Sieyes during the French revolution, Mensheviks in the early 20thcentury, and Antonio Negri today. [read post]
