Search for: "Thomas C. Shields"
Results 1 - 20
of 175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2024, 12:08 pm
Paul (1992), for instance, the Court emphasized that "[w]here the government does not target conduct on the basis of its expressive content, acts are not shielded from regulation merely because they express a discriminatory idea or philosophy. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:00 pm
C. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:03 am
C. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
Section 230 shields users of interactive computer services from liability arising from information provided by third parties. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Similarly, writing last month on Notice & Comment, Cato Institution fellow Thomas Berry argued that “forcing every platform to use identical viewpoint-neutral moderation rules would be a profound infringement on the editorial freedom that has produced a range of social media experiences” and that “[b]eing forced to carry, support, or subsidize speech that one opposes is itself a First Amendment injury. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
Hays, and C. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
§ 230(c)(1). [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 10:35 am
Sub-section (c)(1) and (c)(2) say nothing about other avenues to liability such as distributor liability or liability for the platforms’ own conduct. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
Thomas, 547 U.S. 183 (2006). [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 3:02 am
Lolita C. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Charlene Cantrell Koonce, Andrew C. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
The DPF replaces the Privacy Shield Framework which was invalidated by the Schrems II decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in July 2020. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Justin Hendrix, Justin Cole, Margaret Shields and Nicholas Tonckens, Timeline: Rep. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In an important 1961 article in the Harvard Law Review, Yale Law Professor Alexander Bickel—who was a leading constitutional scholar of his generation—defended the Supreme Court’s exercise of what he called “the passive virtues. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:45 am
Eventually, C. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
§ 1125(c)(3)(C) by claiming its humorous use of the Jack Daniel’s marks was not pure commercial speech because it poked fun at the company in the Bad Spaniels design. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
’ §1125(c)(3)(A). [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
’ §1125(c)(3)(A). [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
’ §1125(c)(3)(A). [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 11:50 pm
September 2023Neues Datenschutzrecht bei Fedlex (Steiger Legal) Neues Datenschutzgesetz (nDSG) und neue Datenschutzverordnung (DSV) als einzelne Artikel (Datenschutzpartner) Neues Datenschutzgesetz (nDSG) und neue Datenschutzverordnung (DSV) mit Botschaft oder erläuterndem Bericht (datenrecht.ch) Neues DSG: Umsetzung und Anwendung in Anwaltskanzleien (Thomas Steiner, Anwaltsrevue) Neues Datenschutzgesetz: Anforderungen, Umsetzung und Anwendung in Anwaltskanzleien… [read post]
