Search for: "Thomas Whitaker" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm by Carl Shusterman
Whitaker – 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Defers to Matter of Bermudez-Cota (1-28-19) 6th Circuit Court of Appeals Defers to Matter of Bermudez-Cota (12-14-18) U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 2:26 pm by Amy Howe
Three justices – Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch – indicated that they would have granted the state’s application, but they did not provide any explanation for their votes. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
Writing in dissent, Judge Thomas Durkin wrote that Alvarenga-Flores’s overall narrative had remained c [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 11:32 am by Anne Joseph O'Connell
(The GAO missed some of this precision in its opinion: Appendix 1 described this latter category as “President directs career official,” but as we saw when Matthew Whitaker was acting attorney general, it also includes political officials.) [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 11:35 am by Lev Sugarman
" The order, issued by Judge Rosemary Collyer, denied attorney Thomas C. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Lev Sugarman
Allen and conversation with Thomas Wright. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:51 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court today brushed aside Thomas Goldstein's clever move to place the legitimacy of Matthew Whitaker as Acting Attorney General before the court through a normally routine motion to substitute a successor for a party appearing in his official capacity. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:09 am by Amy Howe
Justice Samuel Alito dissented from the court’s decision to send the case back, in a brief opinion that was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court lawyer and publisher of SCOTUSblog, who is challenging [Acting Attorney General Matthew] Whitaker’s appointment at the high court in an unusual motion. [read post]
1 Dec 2018, 8:59 am by Walter Olson
What are the implications of the Constitution’s Appointments Clause for the tenure of acting attorney general Matthew Whitaker? [read post]
To drive home this point, the plaintiffs cite Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 12:48 pm by Will Baude
That said, I would not go as far as Justice Thomas in his concurrence in NLRB v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
There were immediate calls by Democrats and watchdogs for Whitaker to recuse himself. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 6:55 pm by Tom Smith
As noted, the most vocal proponent for strict compliance with the Appointments Clause on the Court is Clarence Thomas, not the more Kennedy-esque members of the conservative majority. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 6:39 pm by Tom Smith
The other, as you already know if you’ve read this post, is Clarence Thomas. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 8:34 am by Amy Howe
On his way to the middle of the bench, where the chief justice is waiting, Kavanaugh passes Gorsuch and Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer and Clarence Thomas and shakes hands with them. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 7:04 am by John E. Bies
But the opinion precedes Justice Thomas’s 2017 concurrence, which takes a more functional view of whether an appointment is “temporary” when it can result in exercise of all of the office’s duties over a long period of time If there is a constitutional infirmity to Whitaker’s appointment, it would be almost impossible for him for completely avoid taking actions that would confer standing on someone to litigate the validity of his appointment. [read post]